C++0x support macros

[Milian Wolff]

David Nolden, 30.05.2011:
> Isn't c++0x downward-compatible? Otherwise, I would prefer if this
> would work configuration-free, and we would simply always allow C++0x
> syntax.

I thought it was not compatible as it introduces new keywords. A quick 
question in ##c++ on freenode suggested otherwise:

Apparently the "auto" keyword (not standard before?) changed meaning, but 
otherwise it should all more or less work with code written for the old 
standard. Great :)

So yeah, I'll just try to enable it always.

Bye
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110530/98695ac3/attachment.sig>