ClassFunctionDeclaration: Cpp specificas? (Defaulted/Deleted or Signal/Slot)

[Milian Wolff]

Hey all, esp. David ;-)

I have a patch locally that properly tracks default/deleted flag in the 
DUChain, similar to AbstractFunctionFlag or Signal/Slot in 
ClassFunctionDeclaration.

But I wonder: Both defaulted/deleted and signal/slot are (imo?) Cpp specific - 
should we still put it in the global language agnostic API?

The reason I did it this way for now is that it does not have any overhead, 
i.e. we have the ClassFunctionFlags anyways and storing an additional 

Though from a API pov this looks rather unclean to me - what do you think?

Considering that there is already a QtFunctionDeclaration which should store 
the sig/slot stuff, we can have a specific-to-C++ ClassFunctionDeclaration that 
also tracks defaulted/deleted flag and others as required?

bye
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110618/94a0d450/attachment.sig>