error checking in c++
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Fri Jun 3 13:39:55 UTC 2011
David Nolden, 03.06.2011:
> Since the duchain is just an approximation, and always will (due to
> the preprocessor, it's not possible to build a 100% exact
> representation for C++), it's better to be forgiving than being too
> pedantic. We've still got the compiler after all.
Yes, I agree. You don't answer my question though:
If we can report errors, should we? Esp. things which don't require extensive
type lookups or stuff like that should - imo - be implemented.
Or not?
--
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110603/f649d0c1/attachment.sig>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list