Review Request: pointer-to-member ast and parsing implementation

[Milian Wolff]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100239/#review883
-----------------------------------------------------------


what happened to this? Floris, are you still working on the unit tests?

- Milian


On Dec. 28, 2010, 5:04 p.m., Floris Ruijter wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100239/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 28, 2010, 5:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> the summary covers it quite well.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/CMakeLists.txt 7eba67f 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/cpptypes.h 87645e9 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/expressionvisitor.cpp 099b76e 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/ptrtomembertype.h PRE-CREATION 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/ptrtomembertype.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/tests/test_duchain.cpp 97327fb 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/type_visitor.cpp cf00e6c 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/typebuilder.h 7fff507 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/typebuilder.cpp 73723b2 
>   languages/cpp/parser/ast.h cd896f7 
>   languages/cpp/parser/codegenerator.cpp fcdb04c 
>   languages/cpp/parser/default_visitor.cpp 3d061ff 
>   languages/cpp/parser/parser.cpp b07910a 
>   languages/cpp/parser/tests/test_parser.cpp b4dddc2 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100239/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> as far as i tested, parsing works flawlessly
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Floris
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20110114/0174624d/attachment.html>