mail at milianw.de
Fri Feb 18 17:39:21 UTC 2011
On 02/18/11 14:17, David Nolden wrote:
> This shouldn't be moved back to kdevplatform/kdevelop so quickly.
Yes, I am with you here. That's why I said: -> git playground -> polish.
The latter takes time we all should know ;-)
> It first has to be "finished", well-integrated, and maintained well for a
> Apart from that, the kdereview step can be skipped, because noone except for
> a few kdevelop-devs will look at this anyway (if at all).
That is only true for the code, but not for other stuff like
translations, desktop files, ...
I got invaluable feedback before and we should continue to do that imo.
> @Miha: You're welcome finishing up and polishing the plugin. My feeling was,
> that it wasn't integrated in the UI very well, and was using some
> inconsistent UI concepts that were used nowhere else in kdevelop (especially
> in the tree-view).
> Overall though, I'm not sure whether the KDevelop team is able to properly
> maintain this beast, especially considering that the plugin deals with
> ever-changing external programs.
More information about the KDevelop-devel