Review Request: Offer create private/protected members when possible in missingdeclarationaction

[Jonas Jacobi]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102625/#review8898
-----------------------------------------------------------


> <apol> rischwa: add a ping comment in the review -.- sometimes we just forget
:D

- Jonas Jacobi


On Sept. 17, 2011, 8:28 a.m., Jonas Jacobi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102625/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 17, 2011, 8:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDevelop.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Currently only public member variables can be declared in some contexts.
> This patch checks whether private/protected members would be also accessible from the current context (disregarding friend declarations atm)
> and if so, offer the possibility to create the members.
> e.g.
> 
> class A {
> public:
>   A(int x) : mUndeclared(x) {} // <- declare mUndeclared as private/protected/public member
> };
> 
> class B : public A {
> public:
>   void foo() {
>     A a(2);
>     a.undeclared = 5; // <- declare undeclared as protected/public
>   }
> };
> 
> class X {
> public:
>   void bar() {
>     B b;
>     b.undeclared = 5; // <- declare undeclared as public
>   }
> };
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   languages/cpp/cppduchain/missingdeclarationassistant.cpp bafc159 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102625/diff/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I'm currently using it
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jonas Jacobi
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20111212/2e2246cb/attachment.html>