Git Support ready-ness

Aleix Pol aleixpol at
Mon Sep 6 11:41:01 UTC 2010

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:17 PM, David Nolden <zwabel at> wrote:

> 2010/9/6 Andreas Pakulat <apaku at>:
> > Hmm, thats true. So drop Update and use Pull, though if we ever want to
> > support Pull completely I think it'll look somewhat strange to have Pull
> > and Pull... in the same menu...
> Currently "Update" and "Pull..." do the same thing, so we need only
> one of them. If we want a real pull with choice of pull-source, we
> could call it "Pull From..." or something like that.
> Greetings, David
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at

There is a little difference, update should be sensitive to the directory
you're in and pull is repository-wise, so I guess we should make pull stay.
Another point is that a git user will be more familiar to git vocabulary
instead of svn's.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list