Why are empty Indexed*Identifier checked for ref counting?
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
Tue May 4 22:15:22 UTC 2010
Hey all, esp. David:
Why are IndexedQualifiedIdentifier and IndexedIdentifier checking
shouldDoReferenceCounting when they are empty? I.e. their ctors without any
arguments.
And actually I'd be interested in why we need something like
emptyConstantIdentifierPrivateIndex() at all. It uses e.g.:
static uint index = identifierRepository->index(DynamicIdentifierPrivate());
if (index == 0)
...
the doc comment of ->index tells us, that it can _never_ be 0, hence either
the conditional is obsolete or the comment is wrong.
And shouldn't/couldn't we use m_index(0) for the empty case, just like with
IndexedStrings? That would also speed up KDevelop, since right now e.g. the
IndexedQualifiedIdentifier in the CodeModel always goes through this no matter
what. The question is of course whether it should do duchainrefcounting at
that point or not ;-)
A few more doccomments would certainly be welcome!
bye
--
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20100505/6e941161/attachment.sig>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list