more ui polishing: working sets

Milian Wolff mail at milianw.de
Sun Jan 17 00:28:19 UTC 2010


On Friday 08 January 2010 14:54:22 Sam S. wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> after two failed attempts to send a similar message to the
> kdevelop-devel list this week (according to Andreas, possibly a
> problem with the spam filter), here goes a third try...
> I've completely rephrased the text and also added the kdevelop list as
> recipient, so hopefully this time it'll reach you guys...
> 
> Anyhow, I've made a proposal (including detailed mockups) for how the
> KDevelop UI elements regarding working sets could be made to look &
> behave like so that this functionality will be
>   - less intrusive for people who do not want to use it
>   - still easy enough to discover, and easier to understand for people
> who might want to try it
>   - more comfortable to use for people who do use it
> 
> You can find it at:
>    smls75.sqweebs.com/kdevelop working sets proposal/

I think we need .svgz + png's in various sizes for _each_ of the icons, could 
you create them?

And afaik it should be enough to have one version, we can do the inverting 
manually if required.
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20100117/bdaab71a/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list