apaku at gmx.de
Sun Feb 28 19:48:25 UTC 2010
On 28.02.10 17:25:34, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010 21:01:05 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > That leads me to the question: Is it worth it? Most of the history
> > interesting to us is the KDevelop4 history which afaik has no roots back
> > to the kdevelop3 codebase. So we could just drop the kde3 and older
> > branches when moving to git proper and import the kde3-and-older stuff
> > without further work into a kdevelop-legacy git module. Thoughts?
> Yes I like the kdevelop-legacy git module idea. It keeps the main branch
Well, the history for master would simply be shorter. To get a proper
kdevelop-legacy I still need to sort out the "mess" in svn
history/moving/merging. Unless we'd only move the kdev4-code to git and
leave the rest in svn and leave the burden of figuring out how to move
this to git to those that work on moving all of KDE.
Anyway, I think I've made quite some progress meanwhile with the
complete conversion. At this point dropping out the "old" history is
merely a matter of using a separate git-repository for the rules and
running the ruleset again.
Good day for overcoming obstacles. Try a steeplechase.
More information about the KDevelop-devel