Review Request: Use different macro replacements for SIGNAL and SLOT
Tobias Koenig
tokoe at kde.org
Mon Apr 12 10:39:31 UTC 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3570/
-----------------------------------------------------------
Review request for KDevelop.
Summary
-------
This patch replaces the internal __qt_sig_slot__ macro with the two macros __qt_signal__ and __qt_slot__, this allows to check whether the SIGNAL or SLOT macro has been used in the original source code.
Diffs
-----
/trunk/extragear/sdk/kdevelop/languages/cpp/cppduchain/tests/test_duchain.cpp 1113929
/trunk/extragear/sdk/kdevelop/languages/cpp/parser/lexer.cpp 1113929
/trunk/extragear/sdk/kdevelop/languages/cpp/parser/parser.cpp 1113929
/trunk/extragear/sdk/kdevelop/languages/cpp/parser/tokens.h 1113929
/trunk/extragear/sdk/kdevelop/languages/cpp/parser/tokens.cpp 1113929
/trunk/extragear/sdk/kdevelop/languages/cpp/setuphelpers.cpp 1113929
Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3570/diff
Testing
-------
Run unit tests without signal/slot related errors
Thanks,
Tobias
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list