What's missing for 4.0

[Ben Boeckel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Aleix Pol wrote:
> Well of course we need to plan and to do it well if you wish. 
It's free
> software anyway, so the quality of our release depends on our 
willing as a
> community. And anyway, I think it's ubuntu that they're 
already packaging
> kdevelop4 as a released application, people needs KDevelop 4.
> 
> About the unmaintained stuff we can always wait right before 
the release and
> then decide, it's an easy task to remove code :P.
> 
> I don't think the week of beta cycle is that much relevant, 
we've been
> releasing beta's for months already.
> 
> Cheers!
> Aleix

Sorry for bringing back an older thread. I've been building 
nightly RPMs for Fedora for myself and it's been on a repo for 
people who ask for months. kdevplatform is in Fedora proper 
(only krazy2 will use it once I get things built). I'm looking 
to build KDevelop4 for F-13. Discussing with KDE-SIG now.

- --Ben
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
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=SoSm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----