New release-plan

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 27.11.09 23:39:56, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> Speaking about repository locations. I'm not actively participating in 
> development now, so take my words with a grain of salt, but I believe that if 
> we ever move out of the trunk/KDE source tree, then we should go right to 
> gittorious and adopt a release scheme of Linux kernel:
> 
> - "master" or "trunk" branch is always stable
> - new features are developed in branches and are merged once ready (really 
> easy to do with git)
> - release at any time when master/trunk has anything valuable (this usually 
> means releasing often, up to 4-5 releases per year)
> 
> 
> In my company, we're doing the same even without doing too many branches, and 
> this process still works. And I should say, it works really well.

+1, but I'd like to take one step at a time. Especially since we'd need
Thiago to do the conversion (or somebody else) as it might require
read-access to the svn repository on the machine it resides. (at least
thats how amarok converted).

I'm not sure about the actual scheme we should/could be using, but thats
something to discuss once we do use git.

Andreas

-- 
You plan things that you do not even attempt because of your extreme caution.