Test KDevelop4 with --graphicssystem native

[Aleix Pol]

On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Kishore <kitts.mailinglists at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Saturday 21 Nov 2009 8:36:56 pm Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 November 2009 13:42:25 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > a recent bugreport shows that raster engine isn't quite the right
> choice
> > > in all cases (remote X, i.e. ssh -X or XDMCP). Which made me re-check
> > > how fast it is nowadays (with Qt4.6) at rendering text. The good news
> > > is, its fast enough to type quickly in kate.
> > >
> > > As this is only 1 system I currently have with Qt4.6, I'd like to
> gather
> > > some feedback from other people running Qt4.6. So please try running
> > > kdevelop with --graphicssystem native and work with that. Let me know
> > > wether its faster as before or slower (we're using raster on Qt4.5.2
> and
> > > later).
> > >
> > > I suggest that if we don't find enough data one way or the other we'll
> > > keep what we have now and see how many bugreports we receive during the
> > > KDE4.4 phase and re-evaluate based on that for 4.1.
> >
> > On NVIDIA (proprietary driver) it doesn't make any difference I can feel,
> >  even with Qt 4.5.3. Will check later with an Intel onboard chip in my
> >  laptop.
> >
> With intel onboard 945 native is better than raster.
> --
> Cheers!
> Kishore
>
> --
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>

Works fine here with both raster and native, but I guess using native will
be better.

Why don't we stop forcing raster for now? If it's outperforming we can go
back to force raster in january. It's something hard to measure, it's more
like a feeling I guess.

Aleix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20091121/4cb7dd4d/attachment.html>