Review Request: Black-box test for (D)VCS-plugins
Fabian Wiesel
fabian.wiesel at googlemail.com
Wed Mar 25 16:14:01 UTC 2009
> On 2009-03-25 02:39:58, Robert Gruber wrote:
> > /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.cpp, line 375
> > <http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/diff/3/?file=3977#file3977line375>
> >
> > Maybe you could use the interface here to import your test-files into the repo?
> >
> > ICentralizedVersionControl::import()
Will do so.
- Fabian
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/#review611
-----------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-03-25 00:44:15, Fabian Wiesel wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated 2009-03-25 00:44:15)
>
>
> Review request for KDevelop.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Tests the various plug-ins on consistency. Currently works with Subversion and Mercurial. CVS needs to be changed to allow local repositories.
> Currently checks:
> All: isVersionControlled(), status(), add(), revert(), commit()
> DVCS: init()
>
> The test also codifies a proposal of the expected behaviour of the interfaces, which would be the common denominator of Subversion and Mercurial.
> Because of that, I thought, I'd rather let this be reviewed, before spending more time on implementing more test-cases, which codify an unwanted behaviour.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/CMakeLists.txt 944152
> /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION
> /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.h PRE-CREATION
> /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.cpp PRE-CREATION
>
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Excluding CVS and Git:
>
> 1/ 1 Testing vcsBlackBoxTest Passed
>
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Fabian
>
>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list