Review Request: Black-box test for (D)VCS-plugins

[Fabian Wiesel]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated 2009-03-25 00:44:15.334182)


Review request for KDevelop.


Changes
-------

- Use TestCore instead of Core
- Link against testshell instead of the standard shell
- Added initialisation steps for a local CVS repository

Should the test rather be placed in a kdevplatform/tests/vcs directory instead of the newly created kdevplatform/vcs/tests?


Summary
-------

Tests the various plug-ins on consistency. Currently works with Subversion and Mercurial. CVS needs to be changed to allow local repositories.
Currently checks:
All: isVersionControlled(), status(), add(), revert(), commit() 
DVCS: init()

The test also codifies a proposal of the expected behaviour of the interfaces, which would be the common denominator of Subversion and Mercurial.
Because of that, I thought, I'd rather let this be reviewed, before spending more time on implementing more test-cases, which codify an unwanted behaviour.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/CMakeLists.txt 944152 
  /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
  /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.h PRE-CREATION 
  /trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/vcs/tests/vcsBlackBoxTest.cpp PRE-CREATION 

Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/384/diff


Testing
-------

Excluding CVS and Git:

1/  1 Testing vcsBlackBoxTest                  Passed

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 1


Thanks,

Fabian