Error while loading project

[Saulo Soares de Toledo]

Already tried, kbuildsycoca4 do not solved.... :_(

Waas run with root user the first time, now I tried with normal user
too, but the error continues...

2009/7/27, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen <admin at leinir.dk>:
> On Monday 27 July 2009 13:17:03 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> On 27.07.09 12:52:50, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen wrote:
>> > On Monday 27 July 2009 12:09:46 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> > > On 27.07.09 11:53:17, Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen wrote:
>> > > > On Monday 27 July 2009 11:46:17 Milian Wolff wrote:
>> > > > > Aleix Pol wrote:
>> > > > > > Looks like your system is not well configured.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Have you ran kbuildsycoca4? (this should happen automatically
>> > > > > > iirc) Are you using any weird setup?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Sadly kbuildsycoca4 is not run automatically when you compile from
>> > > > > sources. You have to run it once after installing new plugins.
>> > > >
>> > > >   We are using a system in amarok which takes care of this little
>> > > > problem for people, apparently found in kdelibs - cute little
>> > > > progress bar widget and everything... Haven't seen the code, but i
>> > > > understand it's fairly simple. Maybe that's an option here as well?
>> > > > :)
>> > >
>> > > I don't think so, amarok (AFAIK) has two binaries and hence its
>> > > possible to run kbuildsycoca4 from the first one, before starting the
>> > > real. In kdevelop4 there's only one binary and I think if you run
>> > > kbuildsycoca4 from its main() function that won't help with the
>> > > current
>> > > process.
>> >
>> >   Amarok only has one binary, but yes, the main logic sits in libamarok,
>> > which is loaded on the run. That's also why the splash screen shows up
>> > so
>> > quickly ;) But yes, the sycoca builder is run from the binary and not
>> > inside the library... not entirely sure how it's done, but it works
>> > really rather well :)
>>
>> Well, this only helps if the user has already set KDEDIRS and also won't
>> help with finding new plugins. So its basically useless for us as those
>> are
>> the two cases that people have problems with. IMHO running kbuildsycoca4
>> once after setting up KDEDIRS properly is much less of a problem then
>> getting KDEDIRS right in the first place.
>
>   Ah right :) There is also the case that KDev has a slightly different
> target
> audience to Amarok - Amarok doesn't really expect people to know what a
> command line is, and that is a quite fair assumption with programmers :)
>
> --
> ..Dan // Leinir..
> http://leinir.dk/
>
>                           Co-
>                             existence
>                           or no
>                             existence
>
>                           - Piet Hein
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>