on documentation

Aleix Pol aleixpol at kde.org
Sat Jan 31 20:27:58 UTC 2009


On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 5:31 PM, David nolden <
david.nolden.kdevelop at art-master.de> wrote:

> Am Samstag 31 Januar 2009 17:13:56 schrieb Aleix Pol:
> > hi list!
> >
> > I was thinking on kdevelop 4's documentation support. I've been checking
> > some of the code we have in playground. It is quite disappointing to see
> > that much of the code there is just oriented to support many many
> > documentation formats but real actual integration.
> >
> > I think it would be nice to have proper integration support. For now
> > doxygen and qt assistant would be nice, or maybe just assistant (since
> most
> > of it could be used by getting it from Qt's assistant, QHelpEngine).
> >
> > What I think it would be important would be that this documentation
> support
> > could be (easily) integrated with the DUChain. That would mean to be able
> > to identify classes and method names and relate them to the proper
> > documentation pages and show c++ reference if using c++ and Qt, and
> pyqt's
> > doc if using python.
> >
> > What do you think about it? Is there any work to do so already done?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aleix
>
> I think the first most important thing is, as you say, integration with the
> duchain.
>
> For the start, we could just have something like this:
> class IDocumentation : public KShared, public QObject {
> //Should return a short version of the documentation
> virtual QString html() = 0;
> virtual KSharedPtr<IDocumentation> executeLink(QString link);
> //Should open this documentation within an own part within KDevelop
> virtual void showSeparateDocumentation();
> Q_SIGNALS:
> //Can be usd to signalize that new documentation is available(maybe
> downloaded
> from the internet)
> void documentationFetched();
> };
>
> class IDocumentationPlugin {
> //Should return 0 if no documentation for the declaration is available from
> this plugin
> virtual KSharedPtr<IDocumentation>
> documentationForDeclaration(KDevelop::Declaration* declaration) = 0;
> };
>
> Then we could start implementing different documentation-provider plugins
> one
> by one. The first one we really need is one for Qt, since Qt does not have
> any
> in-header comments. The main question is how to get the relevant
> information.
>
> The navigation-widgets could just query for all plugins implementing
> IDocumentationPlugin, and try getting documentation from them.
>
> Greetings, David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>

I'm wondering if this "executeLink" should be here.. Why don't simply let
the part version to deal with the links?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20090131/a7cc5c57/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list