interface names [Was: on documentation]

Aleix Pol aleixpol at kde.org
Sun Feb 1 01:01:03 UTC 2009


I have seen we can use: <classname>_iid, it is actually defined by
KDEV_DECLARE_EXTENSION_INTERFACE_NS, so we don't need another one...

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:

> On 31.01.09 17:31:00, David nolden wrote:
> > Am Samstag 31 Januar 2009 17:13:56 schrieb Aleix Pol:
> > > hi list!
> > >
> > > I was thinking on kdevelop 4's documentation support. I've been
> checking
> > > some of the code we have in playground. It is quite disappointing to
> see
> > > that much of the code there is just oriented to support many many
> > > documentation formats but real actual integration.
> > >
> > > I think it would be nice to have proper integration support. For now
> > > doxygen and qt assistant would be nice, or maybe just assistant (since
> most
> > > of it could be used by getting it from Qt's assistant, QHelpEngine).
> > >
> > > What I think it would be important would be that this documentation
> support
> > > could be (easily) integrated with the DUChain. That would mean to be
> able
> > > to identify classes and method names and relate them to the proper
> > > documentation pages and show c++ reference if using c++ and Qt, and
> pyqt's
> > > doc if using python.
> > >
> > > What do you think about it? Is there any work to do so already done?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Aleix
> >
> > I think the first most important thing is, as you say, integration with
> the
> > duchain.
> >
> > For the start, we could just have something like this:
> > class IDocumentation : public KShared, public QObject {
> > //Should return a short version of the documentation
> > virtual QString html() = 0;
> > virtual KSharedPtr<IDocumentation> executeLink(QString link);
> > //Should open this documentation within an own part within KDevelop
> > virtual void showSeparateDocumentation();
> > Q_SIGNALS:
> > //Can be usd to signalize that new documentation is available(maybe
> downloaded
> > from the internet)
> > void documentationFetched();
> > };
> >
> > class IDocumentationPlugin {
> > //Should return 0 if no documentation for the declaration is available
> from
> > this plugin
> > virtual KSharedPtr<IDocumentation>
> > documentationForDeclaration(KDevelop::Declaration* declaration) = 0;
> > };
>
> I'd rather have s/Plugin/Support/ here and IMHO a static getter isn't
> really needed.
>
> On a related note: What we might want to do however is start putting the
> interface id's (i.e. org.kdevelop.IFoo) into static const strings
> accessible in the interface class. I know that IProjectFileManager is
> used in at least two different places in kdevplatform.
>
> Andreas
>
> --
> Don't you wish you had more energy... or less ambition?
>
> _______________________________________________
> KDevelop-devel mailing list
> KDevelop-devel at kdevelop.org
> https://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20090201/faad545e/attachment.html>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list