Version number for KDE 3.5.8

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 02.10.07 15:55:46, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007 14:38:39 Kris Wong wrote:
> > > I do not see the 3.4.90 binaries being a problem. And it's
> > > not confusing:
> > > -3.4.90 is always and will always be better that 3.4.2
> > > -3.4.2 will (when released) be as good as 3.4.90, what is the
> > > problem with
> > >   that ?
> >
> > The problem is they are the same code.  The application cannot have 2
> > version numbers unless someone bumps the version down to 3.4.2 in svn, does
> > the tag, then bumps it back up to 3.5.  This is strange, and I disagree,
> > it's confusing.  It also gives the impression that we're developing some
> > new version of the KDevelop 3.x series, which we're not.
> 3.4.2 is the version in the KDE/3.5/kdevelop branch. Once released the branch 
> will be closed and the 3.4.x release series will die there.
> 
> The way I see it 3.5.0 will come from kdevelop/3.5 branch and will have it's 
> first official release 3.5.0 in a month or so.
> It will have more features than 3.4.2, but the main one is that it will have 
> it's release schedule decoupled from KDE releases.

And thats were you are wrong. I have permission from the release
maintainer to merge back the branches/kdevelop/3.5 branch into KDE/3.5
and I will do so including all new features.

Andreas

-- 
You will be awarded some great honor.