Static access to ICore

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 16.11.07 21:03:43, Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2007 19:35:06 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> 
> > Huh? Ok, the constructor check would help if one could directly create
> > an ICore object, but the destructor check doesn't help with anything, if
> > instance != it gets set to 0, if it already is 0, well nothing happens
> > in the end.
> 
> Well, as I presume that only one instance is ever created, that check is 
> almost free and would catch the rather fatal bug if it was created twice. 
> Likewise with the destructor: While unlikely, the check is nearly free (could 
> be an assert, even) and is a nice sanity check. I admit I might be too 
> paranoid there. Blame my IT career ;)

Hehe, I just added the assert to the constructor, indeed that check is
quite cheap and doesn't really hurt.

Andreas

-- 
You have Egyptian flu: you're going to be a mummy.