Current state of duchain/parser

[Adam Treat]

On Friday 11 May 2007, Jakob Petsovits wrote:
> If Hamish is still listening: we'd appreciate advice on what exactly is
> necessary and how to get there best. If you could spare some time for
> reactivating the duchain, we'd not be disappointed either.

Hamish recently posted the following on kwrite-devel about this very problem.  
See here:

******BEGIN FORWARD******
> Hmm, the assert looks ok for me, but no expert in this area, Hamish has
> written both the code in kdevelop and kate, I guess he should take a look.
> Beside, I think non-recursive won't be a good idea...

The problem here is that jowenn changed the lock to be recursive, because of 
some problem with using kate's dbus interface and a deadlock.  The lock 
shouldn't be recursive imho, it's the deadlock which needs to be fixed.  I 
have just moved out of home and don't have an internet connection so I 
haven't been able to work on it though.

Either someone can take a look at the deadlock (attached) and we revert the 
lock to non-recursive, or I'll take a look at it when I can.

Cheers,
Hamish.
******END FORWARD******

Cheers,
Adam