VCS Interfaces, round 3

[Matthew Woehlke]

Matt Rogers wrote:
> On May 4, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
>> Matt, the reason to have this split is that some VCS don't allow to work
>> on the repo directly (Matthew said perforce doesn't for example) and
>> this way its much easier to communicate this to the API users. A plugin
>> that can't do stuff like remove() directly on repository paths simply
>> doesn't implement the repository interface.
> 
> Ok, so that makes sense. Do the docs clarify this as well? If not,  
> they should.

Yes, they should. The doc isn't very good right now, probably because we 
don't want to invest a lot of time in it while things are still fluid 
(at least, that's /my/ excuse :-)).

-- 
Matthew
Current geek index: 62%