Signals in the api and the KDevelop:: namespace

[Matt Rogers]

On Friday 04 May 2007 05:52, David Nolden wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007 12:43:40 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 04.05.07 10:55:53, David Nolden wrote:
> > The signals in those two files don't mean anything at all, as the
> > classes are not derived from QObject. Its just a hint to the developer
> > that the implementation will have these signals.
>
> But they seem to match the real signals available. :)
>
> > > Since Qt does only do string-matching when connecting signals, these
> > > should be unified. Either always with KDevelop::, or never.
> >
> > Agreed, so which one do we take? I think including the namespace is a
> > bit better to clarify where the argument comes from.
>
> I think too that we should include the namespace. It is a little more
> typing, but it's more logical.
>
> greetings, David
>

include the namespace.
-- 
Matt