KDE/kdevplatform/plugins/subversion

dukju ahn dukjuahn at gmail.com
Sun Jul 29 10:54:16 UTC 2007


2007/7/29, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de>:
> On 29.07.07 04:58:06, dukju ahn wrote:
> > 2007/7/28, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de>:
> > > On 28.07.07 18:30:14, Dukju Ahn wrote:
> > > > --- trunk/KDE/kdevplatform/plugins/subversion/svn_revision.h #693699:693700
> > > > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > > >  #define SVN_REVERT   (KDevelop::VcsJob::Revert)
> > > >  #define SVN_COPY     (KDevelop::VcsJob::Copy)
> > > >  #define SVN_MOVE     (KDevelop::VcsJob::Move)
> > > > +#define SVN_CAT      (KDevelop::VcsJob::Cat)
> > >
> > > Whats this? Apart from the fact that you didn't commit the change in
> > > vcsjob and thus broke the build, why these defines? Whats the use case
> > > for that?
> >
> > Because svn has its unique operations that are not counted
> > by our common interface. In most cases its ok but, think about
> > "svn switch", "svn info". The VcsJob will not define enums for
> > these operations, but subversion plugin still needs this.
> >
> > So I had no choice but to define job types again.
>
> I'm not questioning wether you need to invent new enum values, but I'm
> questioning the use of the #define's here. #define is _not_ a proper
> enum and I don't see a reason why you have them and not use
> KDevelop::VcsJob::Cat and Co directly - or SvnJob::Info, SvnJob::Switch.

But why is the #define too bad? It doesn't do any harm as far as
the values are defined correctly. What is the benefit if I redefine
everything into enum values such as SvnJob::commit ..?




More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list