useful stuff in lib/ (was Let's discuss KDevelop4 interfaces and shell)

[Alexander Dymo]

On Friday 19 January 2007 17:44, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> The first option is of course not realistic. Both 2 and 3 are proven
> solutions, but 3 is imho much preferable. It gives us better
> separation and *avoids linking* which the d-pointer scheme typically
> does not. This is a very real benefit when working on a large codebase
> with limited (cpu)time. KDevelop3 had this, and I would not want to
> lose this benefit in KDevelop4.

Right, I completely forgot that it's so cool to develop app when you don't
have to relink all plugins after the change in a shell.