[dymo at ukrpost.ua: Re: 3 new templates for KDev3]

Mathieu Chouinard mchouinard at mcrd.ath.cx
Fri Aug 31 19:42:51 UTC 2007


On Tuesday 28 August 2007 13:09:31 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> below find a message from Alexander on the kdevelop-devel list regarding
> how to proceed with KDevelop3.4. Currently we have 3 people with
> ready-to-be-used patches that introduce a couple of user
> visible strings and we're trying to find a good way of putting these
> into kdevelop3.4 without too much overhead for everybody.
>
> See his mail (quoted at the end) for the options we have - basically the
> question is if we can get an unfreeze for kdevelop before the next KDE
> 3.5 release (if there will be none, this whole discussion is of course
> needless and we can just release on our own) or have to branch again and
> live with untranslated parts in kdevelop3.4.2?
>
> We would like to be in the next KDE 3.5 release, as that spares us some
> extra work and it makes sure that our strings are updated (which doesn't
> happen for the branch without extra effort).
>
> Why KDevelop qualifies for an exception - IMHO: KDev3.4 will probably
> stay around for much longer than most of the rest of KDE 3.5. We're
> currently aiming a first release of 4.0 around KDE 4.1 and its not quite
> clear how much of the pretty rock solid KDev3 will be done at that time.
>
> Andreas
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Alexander Dymo <dymo at ukrpost.ua> -----
>
> From: Alexander Dymo <dymo at ukrpost.ua>
> To: KDevelop Developer Mailinglist
> <kdevelop-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de> Subject: Re: 3 new templates for
> KDev3
> Reply-To: KDevelop Developer Mailinglist
> <kdevelop-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de>
>
> On 8/27/07, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 24.08.07 18:29:44, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > I guess we need to go the "publish the templates on our website" route
> >
> > :(
>
> Ok, this is the last straw....
> I propose we either
> 1) create a kdevelop/3.5 or kdevelop/3.4.5 branch
> or
> 2) unfreeze (both messages and featuress) KDE/3.5/kdevelop branch
>
> We could have then my ruby support features, Megan's astyle fixes and
> Andreas' templates and maybe something else. Looks like Amilcar has a
> reliable way to do fast binary releases so releasing that in 2-3
> months from now should not be a problem.
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----

I have a few modification that make writing qtopia4 applications
easier ...
Mathieu





More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list