KDE/kdevelop [POSSIBLY UNSAFE]
Andreas Pakulat
apaku at gmx.de
Wed Apr 25 23:45:36 UTC 2007
On 25.04.07 23:33:14, David Nolden wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007 23:13:44 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 25.04.07 18:48:16, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > On 23.04.07 17:49:39, David Nolden wrote:
> > > > boost-serialization -- is used for the whole messaging system, is far
> > > > superior to qt's serialization-stuff, so it cannot be replaced. The
> > > > only problem, that still has to be worked on, is that it creates very
> > > > big executables when compiled in debug-mode.
> > >
> > > Wow, 15 Meg is really big (that is libnetwork as static lib).
> >
> > Well, as one can see from the commits I turned the whole plugin to
> > release mode. Now it links within seconds, before it would take >30
> > minutes, even if the 3 libs are built in release mode.
> >
> > This way there's no chance of debugging the teamwork plugin, so I'd like
> > to know how long it takes for others to link after removing the SET
> > calls in the CMakeLists.txt and using BUILD_TYPE=debugfull.
> >
> > Andreas
>
> For me the linking usually takes about one minute I think, 30 minutes sounds
> really extreme.
For Alexander it also took only 20 seconds (on MacOSX btw). I really am
wondering where this might come from, any idea how to find out where ld
is spending its time? (I'm on a stock debian unstable here) And ld takes
nearly all CPU, but only 15% of memory. I'll see tomorrow how long it
took in the end.
Andreas
--
You will receive a legacy which will place you above want.
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list