gdb-mi current status
Vladimir Prus
ghost at cs.msu.su
Thu May 11 11:41:09 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 15:44, Hamish Rodda wrote:
Hi Hamish,
> From my experience with the -mi branch, three things currently stand out as
> important issues:
>
> 1) User interface delay, and more importantly, apparent forgetting of
> requests issued by the user during debugger busy periods.
>
> I find that the delay from having to re-issue step commands (and having to
> realise that the command was lost) far outweighs the delay of the debugger
> actually doing processing :(
I must admit I'm not yet sure what the problem is. In my testing, repeatedly
pressing F10 steps the debugger just fine, and pretty quickly too. The step
action gets disabled when command is sent to gdb, but then becomes enabled
again and handles next press of F10. I'm not sure if I'm using wrong
testcases, or there some other differences.
I can cause different kind of problem -- when pressing F10 too fast, KDevelop
can try to create variable object for a variable that's no longer in scope,
getting error. I'll try to look into that.
- Volodya
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list