Configuration options for QMake project
apaku at gmx.de
Sun Jul 30 18:12:32 UTC 2006
On 30.07.06 10:19:39, Ian Reinhart Geiser wrote:
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 09:46, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 29.07.06 08:14:55, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > > On Friday 28 July 2006 18:39, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > before making to many changes on my own, I'd like to know about a
> > > > couple of things:
> > > >
> > > > 1. The current configuration dialog supports the setting of "console"
> > > > for the CONFIG variable, however this has only an effect on win32 so I
> > > > think this should be removed
> > >
> > > Remember that Qt is cross platform. You can develop on Linux for windows.
> > > We'll need to keep this option IMHO.
> > Ok, that does make sense. What about the windows option? Should I add
> > it?
> > > > 2. The "Build as DLL" and the "Shared" option are duplicates, i.e. If
> > > > choosing "shared library" this adds the "dll" keyword to CONFIG, and
> > > > "Build as DLL" does the same, so I think the "Build as DLL" option
> > > > should be removed.
> > >
> > > I think it should be renamed to 'Build as Shared Library'.
> > Huh? Why do you want to keep the duplicate option? As I said, they both
> > activate the same option for the CONFIG variable, so I don't really see
> > a reason for keeping both.
> Remember that you can use mingw32 to build Windows applications from KDevelop.
> Even then at least at my company we do our development on Linux and
> Integration on OSX, Win32.
Do you reference the console-Option or the build-as-shared/dll Option?
For the first one: I added console again.
For the second one: As I already tried to explain, both ui-options are
"translated" to the same CONFIG variable and thus they are duplicates of
each other. That's why I removed one.
You will feel hungry again in another hour.
More information about the KDevelop-devel