in module source reorganization

[Richard Dale]

On Friday 17 February 2006 21:39, Matt Rogers wrote:
> ahh, i forgot to mention that this is for KDevelop 4. Sorry. I wouldn't
> want to do something like this for KDevelop 3.4.
Ah ok! Please ignore my comments, obviously kdevelop 4 should be as tidy as 
possible. Maybe we should put the version number in the subject so we always 
know which kdevelop we're talking about..

-- Richard