KDevelop 3.4 release schedule

Alexander Neundorf neundorf at kde.org
Wed Apr 19 19:20:28 UTC 2006

On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:32, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> > Why "alpha", Amilcar?
> Because some stuff is still not merged in.
> And alphas are more liberal (no freeze implied) than betas.
> > And why before MI, which according to  Vladimir
> > is essentially finished?
> Because I no not want to put pressure on the developers to merge the code.
> This is GPL code and no one gets paid to do ASAP coding.
> > Are there external factors I don't
> > understand?
> I was just trying to be polite.
> > Do you have a release schedule in mind?
> This weekend - Alpha 1
> In two weeks - Beta 1

Hmm, but this might mean that the beta is more buggy than the alpha, because 
it contains more new code.
Why not wait with the first release until the MI branch is merged and then 
call it alpha (or beta) ?
IMO it works so good it should be a beta.

Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex AT neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list