KDevelop 3.4 release schedule
neundorf at kde.org
Wed Apr 19 19:20:28 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:32, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> > Why "alpha", Amilcar?
> Because some stuff is still not merged in.
> And alphas are more liberal (no freeze implied) than betas.
> > And why before MI, which according to Vladimir
> > is essentially finished?
> Because I no not want to put pressure on the developers to merge the code.
> This is GPL code and no one gets paid to do ASAP coding.
> > Are there external factors I don't
> > understand?
> I was just trying to be polite.
> > Do you have a release schedule in mind?
> This weekend - Alpha 1
> In two weeks - Beta 1
Hmm, but this might mean that the beta is more buggy than the alpha, because
it contains more new code.
Why not wait with the first release until the MI branch is merged and then
call it alpha (or beta) ?
IMO it works so good it should be a beta.
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: neundorf AT kde.org - http://www.kde.org
alex AT neundorf.net - http://www.neundorf.net
More information about the KDevelop-devel