maintainers (was Re: Me wants me RIDE ;)

[Mickael Marchand]

Roberto Raggi wrote:

>Hi Anne!
>
>On Monday 03 October 2005 16:50, Anne-Marie Mahfouf wrote:
>  
>
>>>From the current state of KDevelop and to not repeat the same errors I
>>    
>>
>>>would
>>>      
>>>
>>say:
>>- someone on templates + KNewStuff support (test templates, document them,
>>remove obsolete, decide wich ones are in and which ones could be get via
>>    
>>
>I think kdevelop-devel is the best place to decide it. But I agree with you we 
>need someone responsible for that
>
>  
>
>>KNewStuff...) -> do we keep all these KDevelop entries in the K menu?
>>    
>>
>NO!!! that's the first thing we're going to kill :-) 
>
>  
>
>>- someone on editor parts (Ysis? ...)
>>    
>>
>the editor integration is part of the framework. So I would like to take it. 
>For KDevelop 4 we are going to target _only_ editors with full KTextEditor 
>support. The programming language framework needs the new 
>KTextEditor::SmartCursor + SmartRange stuff (it's very cool stuff, thanks 
>hamish :-) that means bye bye QEditor and nedit. We'll see if yzis will 
>implement the full KTextEditor specs and then we'll decide if we're going to 
>support it, mikmak?
>  
>
yes, it will, should be no problem ;)
(once I recompile everything -hard drive died- and once my DSL connexion 
stops dying, bad days :/ ...)

Cheers,
Mik

>  
>
>>- someone on doc within KDevelop with maybe the possibility to integrate
>>Wikipedia support?
>>- someone (several!!!!) on KDevelop own doc (handbook)
>>- someone on overall bug fixes (bug triage, reproducing, assignment...)
>>    
>>
>I'm all for it. This is a *huge* task! I think amilar did a great job with the 
>doxy stuff, but this is probably too big for one or two developers.
>we need more, any volunteer? :-)
>
>ciao robe
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>KDevelop-devel mailing list
>KDevelop-devel at barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de
>http://barney.cs.uni-potsdam.de/mailman/listinfo/kdevelop-devel
>  
>