kdevelop_3_3_branch

[Mathieu Chouinard]

On March 1, 2005 12:13, Jens Dagerbo wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 March 2005 17:46, Matt Rogers wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 February 2005 05:38 pm, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > I've created a branch for KDevelop 3.3 development. Features, fixes, etc.
> > > are welcome ;)
> >
> > Discussion about the creation of this branch should have ensued before it
> > was created, because now I see problems with it:
> >
> > 1. People will not know to checkout kdevelop_3_3_branch, HEAD stagnates,
> > people think we've stopped development
> > 2. There is no timeline for qt 4 / kde 4 / kdevelop4 to begin
> > 3. When it comes time to release, you'll have out of date translations.
> >
> > I think the kdevelop_3_3_branch should be merged back to HEAD and if
> > anything we use a branch for kdevelop 4 development.
> 
> I must agree with Matt here. I don't understand why we branch for the 
> continued development, and do porting in HEAD. Does this make sense in some 
> way that I don't understand?
>
Probably Alexander forecasted a longer CVS freeze. but now It don't make sense

> Merging back kdevelop_3_3_branch into HEAD and opening a porting branch when 
> any porting work is actually about to start seems much saner to me.
> 
 
> jd
> 
Make senses and making a kdevelop4 branch when needed will be ok for me
Mathieu

-- 
It is always the best policy to tell the truth, unless, of course,
you are an exceptionally good liar.
 the		-- Jerome K. Jerome