Jens Dagerbo jens.dagerbo at swipnet.se
Tue Mar 1 19:02:05 UTC 2005

On Tuesday 01 March 2005 17:46, Matt Rogers wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 February 2005 05:38 pm, Alexander Dymo wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I've created a branch for KDevelop 3.3 development. Features, fixes, etc.
> > are welcome ;)
> Discussion about the creation of this branch should have ensued before it
> was created, because now I see problems with it:
> 1. People will not know to checkout kdevelop_3_3_branch, HEAD stagnates,
> people think we've stopped development
> 2. There is no timeline for qt 4 / kde 4 / kdevelop4 to begin
> 3. When it comes time to release, you'll have out of date translations.
> I think the kdevelop_3_3_branch should be merged back to HEAD and if
> anything we use a branch for kdevelop 4 development.

I must agree with Matt here. I don't understand why we branch for the 
continued development, and do porting in HEAD. Does this make sense in some 
way that I don't understand?

Merging back kdevelop_3_3_branch into HEAD and opening a porting branch when 
any porting work is actually about to start seems much saner to me.


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list