[PATCH] KDevCustomProject::runDirectory

Andras Mantia amantia at kde.org
Mon Jul 11 19:39:06 UTC 2005


On Monday 11 July 2005 17:32, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Monday 11 July 2005 18:29, Andras Mantia wrote:
> > On Monday 11 July 2005 17:15, Amilcar do Carmo Lucas wrote:
> > > After the release then we can think about BC again.
> >
> > But isn't this about KDevelop inside KDE 3.4, which should be BC
> > with the one from 3.3?
>
> FWIW, I've added *non-virtual* member, so BC should not matter at
> all, IIRC.

I saw it afterwards, I was just raising my voice that BC is *still* 
important.

Andras

-- 
Quanta Plus developer - http://quanta.kdewebdev.org
K Desktop Environment - http://www.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdevelop-devel/attachments/20050711/66955726/attachment.sig>


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list