my first post
apaku at gmx.de
Tue Dec 6 19:56:04 UTC 2005
On 06.12.05 19:08:05, Tommaso Massimi wrote:
> On 12/6/05, Andreas Pakulat <apaku at gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 06.12.05 17:20:27, Tommaso Massimi wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > a KDevelop's strange behavoiur (maybe a bug) is annoing me,
> > > so in the paste weeks I digged a bit about it.
> > >
> > > I found the fault already listed here,
> > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113379
> > > I added some details and a question about the source code
> > > where I think the problems is, but I had no answer.
> > ?? What do you mean? Amilcar do Carmo Lucas added a comment.
> please check timestamps...
?? So what?
> and that comment is not explaining me if I really found the trouble or
> what I can do more to take off this defect from kdevelop.
Then nobody with the knowledge yet tried it out. Maybe nobody has time
currently. Please be patient.
> My tests showed that deleting that line things are going better
> (the trouble is not completly solved but there is an improvement),
> but I suppose that line is useful to some other features, so my fix
> could broke some other kdevelop corner.
Right, and thats probably why a developer needs to look into this, but
apparently the devs are currently quite busy elsewhere.
This life is yours. Some of it was given to you; the rest, you made yourself.
More information about the KDevelop-devel