Gideon doctreeview stuff

Eray Ozkural erayo at
Tue Nov 12 23:41:03 UTC 2002

This actually does not sound like a very good suggestion.

If you are saying that we should not be distributing a copy of that 
documentation, that might sound somewhat fine. But if you want to remove the 
code for that, it doesn't sound reasonable.

On Tuesday 12 November 2002 23:07, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> I would like to propose the following change to gideon:
> Remove from doc/doctreeview the STL, LIBC, and KDE2BOOK stuff.  This
> documentation is not necessary for many people.
> Instead, let's put this information, or links to it, at a repository, like
> the kdevelop web site.  If a user wants a local copy of this documentation,
> they are more than welcome to download a tar file, install it themselves,
> and change the directory pointers to that location.
> Would something like this suffice?
> _______________________________________________
> Kdevelop-devel mailing list
> Kdevelop-devel at

Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara
www:  Malfunction:
GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B  EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list