Interesting question...
W. Tasin
tasin at fhm.edu
Tue Jan 8 21:22:06 UTC 2002
W. Tasin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> surfing around I found the following:
>
> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-cvs&m=101040011726388&w=2
>
>
> Ciao
>
> Walter
>
Hmmm...
unfortunately it isn't that easy due to the fact that the automatism of
Makefile.common inside admin/ reacts on every Makefile.am and
configure.in.in in every kind of subdirectory (either added with
EXTRA_DIST or SUBDIRS).
It COULD be handled by makefile rules (to rename the Makefile.ams and
configure.in.in like gideon does and rename it again on creation of the
tarball), but I think in the actual situation of KDevelop 2 (with two
different branches for version 2.1) we shouldn't change this system,
because writing makefiles rules for all supported platforms would need
another beta stage (there'd be always a Solaris or netbsd on which
certain commands inside a makefile won't work).
So I revert the idea... except you are insisting ;-)
Ciao
Walter
PS: AFAICS on gideon this problem doesn't exist anymore, so it really
would be only for 2.1.
--
oohhh sveglia.... il mondo e' ammalato, ma x colpa di chi.........
(Zucchero)
:-------W._Tasin,_FB_04,_FHM-------------------PGP-KeyID:0x7961A645---:
<Key-Fingerprint: 1610 835F 0080 32F4 6140 6CF7 A7D0 44CD 7961A645>
<http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=index&search=0x7961A645&fingerprint=on>
More information about the KDevelop-devel
mailing list