c++ code completion status report

[Richard Dale]

On Friday 04 January 2002 7:11 pm, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> No, the best method is an incremental parser, which is beyond the
> capabilities of our middle-level imperative implementation language, of
> course unless we have a clever coder who can devote the rest of his life to
> implement an incremental LALR parser + type semantics.
Yes, so many grammars, so little time, but I feel LL(k) is king for 
convenience in this case. Backspace becomes 'backtrack'..

-- Richard