A common roadmap

[Richard Dale]

On Wednesday 03 April 2002 10:07 am, Falk Brettschneider wrote:
> Hi!
>
> --- Richard Dale <Richard_Dale at tipitina.demon.co.uk>
>
> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 April 2002 12:50 am, Roland Krause
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Richard,
> > > sounds great, but I really hope you added it to
> >
> > the KDEVELOP_2_BRANCH
> >
> > > because the KDE_2_2_BRANCH was really strictly
> >
> > supposed to be closed
> >
> > > for development...
> >
> > Oh dear! I'm afraid I've added it to KDE_2_2_BRANCH
> > - I'm sorry about that. Is
> > this going to cause problems?
>
> Arghh!!!
> Yes. Please, send the patch public to this list for
> reviewing. I think we will reject your addon because
> of the feature stop but maybe there's a little chance
> if your changes doesn't affect the current code much.
> I think, actually, we must be strong. If we accepted
> your patch, it would be the OK for other ones to still
> contribute addons to KDE_2_2_BRANCH. But we want to
> force to avoid more splitting the work than in Gideon
> and 2.2.
> But because your patch is a quite exotic one, we can
> make an exception. I don't know...
> Richard, what do you think, would it be a problem for
> you revert it and re-apply it to KDEVELOP_2_BRANCH?
> KDevelop-2.1 is out anyway. 2.2 will be made from
> another branch than KDE_2_2_BRANCH.
I took a dump of KDevelop before I started working on it. Is the best way to 
revert to just checkin the old sources again into the KDE_2_2_BRANCH? And yes 
you're quite right, these branches are confusing...

-- Richard