NOW THE COMPROMIZE! (was: Re: A common roadmap)

[Victor Röder]

Hi!

> >I think splitting the effort is a waste. If the team decides to stay with
> > the KDevelop2 line, I think we should simply discontinue the gideon
> > development. I don't have any interest working on a project that noone
> > else is interested in. If you all think this is the faster way to
> > something usefull for non-C++ developers, maybe I should just wait a year
> > and have a look at it again.
>
> Don't worry Matthias, I wrote a bit agressive just to get answers also
>
> >from "silent" Gideon people here for the discussion. I'm happy you also
>
> don't want to split in spite of your latest commits.
> So now it seems clear to all of us that we'll put kdevelop2.2 and gideon
> together in one cvs HEAD.
>
> So be it. Amen.
> Ciao
> F at lk
>
> P.S.:
> The future:
> If development of one of the two subdirs for Gideon and 2.2 dies within
> the next 4 month, can we confirm to remove it from HEAD (maybe just move
> it to a branch)?

I vote for Gideon :-). And KDevelop2.x and Gideon in HEAD is okay for me, too.

And Matthias: I want to say "Thank you" to you for your latest commits.

Bye,
	Gideon