ctags problem with branch 2_2

Roland Krause rokrau at yahoo.com
Tue Sep 11 20:29:01 UTC 2001

Yes, Otto is correct,
I made the constructor such that these options should become
configurable with a dialog later. But per default it will work with 5.0
only. ctags-5 has some advantages over 4 so I would consider upgrading.


--- Otto Bruggeman <bruggie at home.nl> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Etay Meiri wrote:
> > mentioned in the man page (--fields for example). I made
> > the following remarks in the CTagsCommandLine constructor which
> > solved the problem:
> >
> > Do I need to grab a newer version of ctags (this one came
> > with RH 7.1)? or is it something else?
> >
> > BTW: other than that the tag feature is working ok. nice piece of
> > work.
> >
> > TIA
> AFAIK you need 5.0 or better of ctags so get the latest from
> ctags.sourceforge.net. I believe they have src rpms so you should be
> able to make them yourself with rpm --rebuild ctags....src.rpm
> It should be in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/ then...
> Otto

Roland Krause
In the garage of life there are mechanics and 
there are drivers. Mechanics wanted!

Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger

to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«

More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list