TODO list for 2.0 (5/June/2001)
rokrau at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 6 04:21:19 UTC 2001
thanks for the insight :-)
An additional argument for holding off on some of the "clean up"
changes would be, that we need to port most of the CKDevelop stuff to
Kaction/KStdAction, which might just be a lot easier if things stay as
they are now.
It is already pretty clear that some people are going to continue on a
2.1 version. So letz just talk about it then...
PS: Christian, did you already get at it? I noticed that most of the
Menu->Options items aren't working anymore.
--- "F at lk Brettschneider" <gigafalk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Roland Krause wrote:
> > I must say, that I do not like that idea either. While it maybe
> > possible to move some stuff out of CKDevelop to docViewMan we
> should be
> > very careful as to what we really move.
> Yes, OK, I agree with you, at this stage of development for 2.0 it's
> good to indroduce new instability. A real rewrite of DocViewMan to a
> generic one (or such heavy changes as splitting in a editor manager
> a browser view manager) should be moved after the 2.0 release.
> Christian, can you confirm with that?
> F at lk
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
In the garage of life there are mechanics and
there are drivers. Mechanics wanted!
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop-devel