TODO list for 2.0 (5/June/2001)
rokrau at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 5 17:45:17 UTC 2001
I must say, that I do not like that idea either. While it maybe
possible to move some stuff out of CKDevelop to docViewMan we should be
very careful as to what we really move.
Also I believe, that it is sufficient to have kate manage the editviews
(so we wont have any work with that) and move the browser stuff to use
a konqueror part). That'll solve all our problems and we can get rid of
Cleanup is necessary and nice, but please be careful not to break too
many things right before the release.
Let's plan some things for 2.1 instead.
--- "F at lk Brettschneider" <gigafalk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Christian Couder wrote:
> > I'd rather create an EditorsManager and a BrowsersManager and make
> > use these managers.
> Hmm...maybe I'm wroing but it seems this would make it harder to port
> the class to a generic DocViewMan, that's why I'm not a big fan of
> F at lk
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> to unsubscribe from this list send an email to
> kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
> unsubscribe »your-email-address«
In the garage of life there are mechanics and
there are drivers. Mechanics wanted!
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
More information about the KDevelop-devel