KDevelop editor interfaces

Bernd Gehrmann bernd at physik.hu-berlin.de
Sun Apr 22 16:02:35 UTC 2001


On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Matthias Hoelzer-Kluepfel wrote:
> Here is where the problems start: if you go down that road,
> you will end up with adding function after function to your
> interface. And then you will notice that not all
> implementations provide an equivalent functionality. And when
> you are done adding everything kdevelop needs, someone will
> ask you to add everything application xz needs...
> 
> I think having a modular interface is much easier in that
> context.

Yes. We are not the first people with that problem, and it's
not surprising that after Microsoft introduced their COM
queryInterface(), everybody (Apple's core foundation, Bonobo,
Qt 3.0) clones this. In kparts, this is not formally supported,
but the BrowserExtension class shows that it can be simulated
easily :-)

Bernd.



-
to unsubscribe from this list send an email to kdevelop-devel-request at kdevelop.org with the following body:
unsubscribe »your-email-address«



More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list