tasin at e-technik.fh-muenchen.de
Fri Oct 20 09:28:49 UTC 2000
Sandy Meier wrote:
> Am Don, 19 Okt 2000 schrieben Sie:
> > Ahm, I thought about 1.3 - well, 1.2.1, but I agree with the others that
> > we should call it 1.3. Not only because of KDevelop but also because of
> > Cervesia and stuff which gets updated in the kdk, so we could call that
> > kdk-1.3. That would make sense and the splash screen shouldn´t be too
> > difficult to make. Also a beta release (or perhaps only a kdk-1.3-test1
> > ;-) release would make sense as well.
> Ok, I also agree on KDevelop1.3 and a first a beta version. :-)
> Walter or someone else have the time to update the KDK package?
Yes... I will do the kdk-update:
Bernd, please let me know if I should use the last stable version of
Cervisia or sth. else.
My opinion to the version numbering of KDK: We should use the same
version number of kdevelop.
> email: smeier at kdevelop.org ICQ: 27681958
> the KDevelop project: http://www.kdevelop.org
The KDevelop project: tasin at kdevelop.de - http://www.kdevelop.org
oohhh sveglia.... il mondo e' ammalato, ma x colpa di chi.........
:-------W. Tasin, FB
<Key-Fingerprint: 1610 835F 0080 32F4 6140 6CF7 A7D0 44CD 7961A645>
More information about the KDevelop-devel