the past, present and future of KDevelop

John Birch jbb at
Sun May 14 03:58:57 UTC 2000

On Sat, 13 May 2000, you wrote:
> Hi!
> Sandy Meier wrote:
> > In my opinion everyone should first port all important
> > features/documentation from KDevelop1.2 to KDevelop2,  which he added
> > after the KDevelop1.0beta2 release.
> > ...
> > After this I think we should discuss and add new features. Personally I
> > want to implement a new framework for the projectmanagment.
> I suppose re-implementing the project management framework must happen
> at first, don't it? Otherwise it could happen some ported code must be
> implemented twice. Correct me if I'm wrong here.
> > It follows a list of all subscriber of this mailinglist (kdevelop-devel,
> > kdevelop-team) , so everbody knows who is on the road. :-)
> Who's actually still interested in contributing?

I'm up for the debugger, (surprise, surprise)

It also crosses over into the editor. I'm currently in contact with Thomas 
Capricella who's looking at doing a KVim. Don't know what'll happen here. but 
if a kpart for KVim and KWrite exists then we might be able to use these.


More information about the KDevelop-devel mailing list