Version number for KDevelop 1.x

[Bernd Gehrmann]

On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, Martin Piskernig wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> [...]
> > My suggestion: 1.1.2 (so we have the same as KDE 1.1.2 and 1.1.1 isn´t
> > justified ;-) too many translations/new features)
> 
> 1.1.2 without 1.1.1? Strange :-)
> "Indiana Nolden and the Search for the Lost Version Number" (tm)
> I think let's make a 1.2 so every distribution thinks "1.2 is more than 1.1
> let's include it in our dist" instead of "1.1.1 just another bugfix we can
> omit." like they did with KDE 1.1.2 - SuSE/Redhat/... take 1.1.1 for their
> dists.

SuSE includes KDE 1.1.2. According to Waldo, they even ship a newer
version (from CVS) with 6.4. Same for RedHat.

Bernd.