Fwd: Small portability bug in kdevelop-0.4

[Bernd Gehrmann]

In the head branch, there is a macro

AC_DEFUN(KDE_CHECK_LIBDL,
[
AC_CHECK_LIB(dl, dlopen, [
LIBDL="-ldl"
ac_cv_have_dlfcn=yes
])
     
I think adding this to the m4 stuff (and a
call to the macro in configure.in) and replacing 
-ldl with $LIBDL should be enough. However, I 
leave the testing up to you, as I don't have
the time myself...

Bernd.

On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 Sandy Meier wrote:
>Anyone how can solve this problem?
>
>----------  forwarded mail:  ----------
>Subject: Small portability bug in kdevelop-0.4
>Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:47:58 -0500 (CDT)
>From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh at gnu.org>
>
>
>Sandy,
>
>>From your web pages, kdevelop looks like a very good tool.  I
>downloaded it to try it out, but came across one minor bug while
>compiling. 
>
>In kdevelop-0.4/kdevelop/Makefile.am, -ldl is included
>unconditionally.  Under FreeBSD, the dl* functions are part of libc;
>there is no libdl.  I suspect the same is true under other BSDs.
>Perhaps a test to this should be added to configure?
>
>Happy hacking,
>joelh
>
>-- 
>Joel Ray Holveck - joelh at gnu.org
>   Fourth law of programming:
>   Anything that can go wrong wi
>sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped